[Victims of Court Corruption] Despairing Situation - So what are we going to do about it?

Joseph Zernik, I wish to comment on your statement, "When I started my project in early 2007, you could hardly find any information online on judicial corruption in the United States." 

Back in April of 1995 I wrote the first judicial reform initiative in existence. It was then called "Judicial Reform Act of 1996." A gentlemen by the name of Greg Brown who lived in Hollywood, searched the internet for anything he could find comparable to JRA. He could find nothing. What he said was the only thing he found in reference to judges was a website placed on the internet by judges themselves, and they were complaining that they were not getting paid enough for the wonderful job they were performing, and contended that their deserved a greater salary.

After J.A.I.L. first hit the internet, other organizations eventually started up alternatives to the Judicial Accountability Initiative Law. (J.A.I.L.) They sought other methods of  holding the judges accountable, mostly, seeking laws by legislators.

Near every judicial accountability effort is in some way an offspring of JAIL4Judges. Since those days, judicial organizations have popped up like hydras all around across the country. Here we are seventeen years later, and people are still searching for a remedy against wayward judges. They do not understand that the only remedy that will work is the initiative process started back in 1995. To my knowledge, no legislation has ever been passed by the legislators for judicial accountability, including Congress, which has been sitting on the Federal J.A.I.L. Bill offered to them. It is now a document that is filed in the Library of Congress.

Ron Branson



joseph zernik wrote:

I am often asked that question, and my response is as follows:

The older I get, the more I realize how clueless I am.  Given that, the most amazing thing is how fast things move ahead.  When I started my project in early 2007, you could hardly find any information online on judicial corruption in the United States.  Therefore, I aimed to "discover, archive, and disseminate evidence of corruption of the Los Angeles Superior Court...".  I thought that it was rather limited, to Los Angeles County, and I also thought that I would never see any change in my lifetime. 

Perhaps Los Angeles County was an early national center of judicial corruption, but today the corruption is rampant nationwide, credible media, expert, and government reports are abundant online, and the consequences to the peace and welfare of the nation are evident as well.

Such conditions are called in social studies "Tyranny of the Courts", and it prevailed in the European Middle Ages.  It can also be deemed the ultimate tyranny of the English Monarchs (now in UK restricted by and large), being the highest judicial authority.



At 03:34 AM 8/6/2012, you wrote:

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: Despairing Situation - So what are we going to do about it?
Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2012 14:16:52 -0700 (PDT)
From: Stan Antlocer <antolak@att.net>
To: Ron Branson <VictoryUSA@jail4judges.org>


Hi Ron,
Stan Antlocer here. First of all the notion that judges have judicial immunity is not true. See these cases and law that forbid it:

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Ron's note: No cases or laws were provided or attached. Perhaps Stan forgot to attach them.


From: Ron Branson <VictoryUSA@jail4judges.org>
To: Jacob <jrogins@va.metrocast.net>
Sent: Sun, August 5, 2012 8:58:49 AM
Subject: Despairing Situation - So what are we going to do about it?




Jacob Roginski, we have share the same speaking podium together. Have you ever given much serious thought about JAIL4Judges as the only means of getting out of this mess? There is no other way than setting up an Independent Special Grand Jury of the common People who uniquely determine if any judge should enjoy the protections of judicial immunity for their wayward actions, i.e., paragraph 2 of the J.A.I.L. Initiative,
 
"Notwithstanding common law or any other provision to the contrary, no immunities shielding a judge from frivolous and harassing actions shall be construed to extend to any deliberate violation of law, fraud or conspiracy, intentional violation of due process of law, deliberate disregard of material allegations, judicial acts without jurisdiction, blocking of a lawful conclusion of a case, or any deliberate violation of the Constitutions of California or the United States."

Ron Branson


Jacob wrote:

Robert,

We must seek unity, break out of the molds the elites have squeezed us in, stop blaming each other for the condition of the country,  and open our minds to at last an honest and thoughtful examination of where we are, how we got here, and what must be done for change.  When the government is failing us so fundamentally, when the ruling class propaganda no longer sounds credible even to the least politically discerning among us, it is time to re-examine from ground up the truth and soundness of our notions about the nature and history of government in the United States.  Until we understand the Problem, no solutions will be in our sight. 

I hear with dismay folks blaming other folks for our situation, repeating the propaganda of the elite media and political machinery, whose purpose is as it has always been to keep us from focusing on the inherently criminal ruling class.  If the sole cause of our problem really is those people who like to get free things from government, we might as well quit, as all but perhaps one in a million among us are married for life to this sin; bucking Nature is always in vain.  If, on the other hand, one of the principal causes is a system that allows this sin a field of action, we may be able to do something about it.

Only if we manage the daunting task of clearing our view of the myriad of misconceptions the elites have erected in us to obstruct it, will we be in a position to rebuild the culture and practice of liberty and prosperity in this land.

Jacob Roginsky


On 8/3/2012 10:09 AM, Robert Sindelar wrote:

 

Dear Jacob,
 
Your comments below re: ruling vs. masses are absolutely correct. Practicality went out when rulers assembled and were grown to become tyrants over all others. We have come to that point in time Sir.
 
So, What are we going to do about it?
 
Many good men have tried, many good men sit in prisons across our land and off shore. They sit there only because the masses chickened out of holding up there responsibility to a JUST Cause.
 
What do you think friend?