[Victims of Court Corruption] Pretended Jurisdiction
"He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our Constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws."
Declaration of Independence
A district judge in Washington, who is a law prof. at Gonzaga, asked me what I meant when I demanded to be informed of the "nature and cause of the accusation," which is drawn straight from the Washington Constitution! ....
I then demanded that if the court or the prosecutor could not inform me of the nature and cause of the accusation, he must dismiss the charges. Of course, he refused. ... He treated this as if it was a joke.
After the sham circus trial was over, he called me aside and told me that he would like for me to come visit him and he would lead me through the history of the driver license. I asked him if by that he meant how the rights of the people had been confiscated and then rented back as mere privileges?
Some time later I called him and said that I would be in the area and would like to take him up on his offer to teach me the history of the DL. He said he no longer had any of it, but that I could find it in the Gonzaga Law Library.
Any judge who thinks about going honest is reminded of the story of Justice of the Peace Martin Mahoney of Credit River, Minnesota.
uphold@justice.com
--- VictoryUSA@jail4judges.org wrote:
From: Ron Branson <VictoryUSA@jail4judges.org>
To: Sue Anne Seeser <lawsas@sbcglobal.net>
Subject: Truth v. The Social Security Act
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 06:25:39 -0700
Sue Anne Seeser wrote:
That may be true for the Federal Reserve System, but not so for the Social Security Act. In 1937 the court made it clear what made the Social Security Act constitutional. The Congress has removed those elements which now made [makes] it unconstitutional. Have you thought about challenging the unconstitutionality of the SSN?
Take care and Blessings to you and yours. Sue Anne
Sue Anne Seeser:
In response to your comment, Sue, in our current state of the judiciary, it is impossible to challenge the constitutionality of anything within our courts. The judges have totally lost their way as far as truth is concerned. The U.S. Supreme Court has said that absent Notice, a "Court" is not a Court, and all its pretended acts are a nullity, and are as if it never happened. I argued this point in my so-called "conviction" without Notice or arraignment on any charges all the way up to the U.S. Supreme Court, and not one court, including the U.S. Supreme Court, acknowledged their own rulings. When the courts don't honor themselves, what is left?
Should any judge break rank in keeping the deception of the Courts intact, it would collapse the entire house of cards, as illustrated by a new tire. With a new tire, you have air surrounded by sealed fresh rubber. But if you enter just one flaw, i.e., an "insufficient" pin hole, the entire tire goes 100% flat. Every judge must play ball in this entire deception, or they all go down together.
This is precisely why JAIL4Judges is so potentially dangerous to the judicial system. With but only one admission by a particular judge that tries to explain why jury trials are denied in a criminal case, then the whole system collapses. All judges are mired within the same quicksand. The judges can all throw a rescue rope to one another, but the rope only assures they will all sink mutually together in harmony, rescue rope and all. "Though hand join in hand, the wicked shall not be unpunished." Proverbs 11:21.
There are several flaws within the Social Security System, but the main one is, it is all based upon a lie. We were taught that the SSN is 100% voluntary, and that anyone could get out of it any time they wished. We were also told that it would never be used for Identification. All these statements are fraudulent, and a lie, but it did work for purposes of deception. A lie is a lie, and never the truth. The lie is never a foundation for anything but a lie!
The SSN was never intended to be voluntary, as that was a lie. It was never intended that anyone should get out of it, as that was also lie. And it was always intended to be used for Identification, and thus a lie. Everything about the SSN is, and was a lie, and intended to deceive.
Going into Court to convince the Court that it was otherwise is to assume that the Courts are not taken in by this deception, and really do care for the truth, which is false truth. From the beginning, it was intended to be a lie, and not the truth.
Christ identified the devil as a liar, and the father of it, "Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it." John 8:44.
Your proposition presupposes there was once truth in the SSN, which supposition is based upon a deception and a lie. In a certain Superman movie, Lois Lane fell from a skyscraper, and on the way down, Superman comes along a grabs her and says, "I've got you." She says, "You've got me? Who's got you?"
Justice will never come from corrupt judges. If justice is to come at all, it must come directly from the People in the forum of a People's Grand Jury. "And judgment is turned away backward, and justice standeth afar off: for truth is fallen in the street, and equity cannot enter. Yea, truth faileth; and he that departeth from evil maketh himself a prey:" Isaiah 59:14, 15.
Ron Branson
VictoryUSA@jail4judges.org
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home