Sunday, April 08, 2012

[Victims of Court Corruption] Judges' Jobs Injustice - [Americans Starting To Wake Up]

Americans Starting to Wake Up
Re: The Judiciary

Back in 1995 the Lord moved upon the heart of Mr. Branson to compose what is now called JAIL4Judges from his years of court experience. Unknown at the time, the Lord had Mr. Branson at the right places, and at the right times, preparing him for what he was about to do in 1995. Branson had personal access to the District Attorney's Office where he could associate with all the prosecutors, including attending their office Christmas parties. He got to know lead the prosecutors all the way up to the very top, to include inside contact with the Los Angeles County Grand Jury and the Grand Jury Foreman.

But it was not until 1995 that the Lord had him sit down before his archaic computer with a whopping specially made extended 66 meg hard drive before the internet became popular, and within two days he drew up an Initiative that God let him know would shake this nation.

One year later, in 1996 a man by the name to Greg Brown, who was internet savoy before most of you even thought about having a computer, said, "Mr. Branson, I did an internet search for anything I could find on exposing judges on the internet. He stated that the only thing he could find was one website that was put up by judges complaining that they were not getting paid enough for the excellent work they were doing. Not a thing negative.

So, it became apparent that God's leading in the writing of JAIL4Judges was cutting a new path within this country. Since that time, judicial expose sites have flourished and abounded, and the knowledge of judicial corruption is starting to become common knowledge. While most everyone realizes there is a problem with our judiciary, they have not figured out how to deal with this problem. But the answer has been right before them within JAIL4Judges written in 1995.

Mr. Branson has been constantly exposing the Judicial Commissions across this nation, and instructing the People that they are only created as "sandbags" to absorb their complaints, no more. Perhaps that massage is starting to sink in more and more as frustration increases about the judiciary.

Below is a New York post confirming what JAIL4Judges has been saying in its inception in 1995. When the overwhelming majority of the People lose confidence within the judiciary, then maybe they will take action following the message God gave to Mr. Branson of J.A.I.L.

Ron Branson
National J.A.I.L. Commander-In-Chief

Judges’ jobs injustice

Last Updated: 11:58 PM, April 7, 2012

Posted: April 08, 2012

If you’re a New York City judge and get caught breaking court rules, not to worry: The state’s Commission on Judicial Conduct is only too happy to give you a pass.

That’s what the panel proved last week when it let Justice Luis Gonzalez off the hook, scot-free — despite finding, in a lengthy report, that he was a flagrant nepotist who clearly violated the court’s rules.

Indeed, the way Gonzalez — the presiding justice of the Appellate Division’s First Department, covering Manhattan and The Bronx — handed out court jobs, he seemed more like a one-man family-and-friends employment agency than a fair-minded, on-the-merits judge of the court.


Among those who got non-attorney jobs: his ex-wife, his secretary’s brother, his driver’s son and cousin, his executive assistant’s nephew and his previous assistant’s nephew.

It’s a wonder he found time for any judicial matters.

And yet, the complaint against him was dismissed without so much as a reprimand.

Why? Because, the commission found, “hiring for non-lawyer positions at the Appellate Division, First Department, has been a closed process for decades.”

In other words, that’s the way it’s always been done in the First Department — so why hold Gonzalez responsible?

What a pitiful excuse.

Frankly, it speaks volumes about the commission itself — and its relationship to the judges it’s supposed to judge.

Never mind that the report noted that “such a practice undermines the judicial obligation to make appointments based on merit, avoiding favoritism and nepotism.”

And that “it diminishes public confidence in the fairness and impartiality of the courts, even if every person hired for every job was in fact qualified for it.”

(In the case of Gonzalez’s hires, by the way, that wasn’t even always the case.)

Yet the commission practically made the jurist sound a like a hero — saying that “to his credit, Judge Gonzalez has acknowledged shortcomings in the [hiring] protocol . . . and is open to making meaningful change.”

Gee, how swell of him. He and the other appellate justices swiftly adopted the commission’s recommendations.

But none of this should have been necessary. The court’s rules are crystal clear about how employees should be hired — and Gonzalez, like his predecessors, blatantly ignored them.

No one should pretend that any of them are reformers. They made a mockery of the system — and only further eroded public confidence in it.

As for the Commission on Judicial Conduct, its whitewash only reinforces public cynicism about the court.

Read more:

[Victims of Court Corruption] Ron, What Do You Find With The Holding of the Courts as Cited Below?

Ron Branson:

What fault do you find with the holdings of the courts as cited below? 

The problem of We the People lies in the lack of power to force prosecutors to charge judges and prosecutors with crimes.

I believe courts have held that law enforcers have no particularly duty to prevent a person from injuring or committing a crime against another.  In other words, law enforcers get qualified immunity for their failure to behave as a Good Samaritan would respecting crime.  I naturally dissent with this.  Government exists primarily to prevent injustice, and law enforcers constitute the front line of that prevention.

That applies with respect to crimes by government employees, particularly crimes against We the People.

But the Courts have made a good point.  The grand jury exists not to prosecute but to investigate and report.

And yet when the very government employees We the People rely upon for prevention of injustice COMMIT the injustice, does not the citizen have the right to bring this fact to the grand jury, or to conduct the prosecution without the assistance of an official prosecutor?

Clearly America needs new state and federal constitutional provisions redefining the nature of grand jury investigation, providing a formal method free of government interference for the public to bring evidence of crimes to the attention of the grand jury, and a method of forcing prosecutors to show cause why they shouldn’t suffer a penalty for failing to prosecute a crime, particularly one by government employees.

The Sibley case is a clear example.  Deceiving We the People about credentials for the presidency ought to constitute a crime, and certainly a grand jury ought to get involved and investigate when widespread rumor and publicly known evidence suggests that the President is not a natural born citizen.  Running for office while knowing one cannot prove credentials constitutes a form of making false statements to Government under 18 USC 1001.  The DOJ should have prosecuted Obama for this before he took office.

Bob Hurt


Bob, the problem lies with a conflict of interest. First off, most prosecutors aspire to become judges. Most judges were prosecutors. Prosecutors naturally conclude, and falsely so, that their job is to get convictions. If you want to have a good record of convictions, you certainly want to stay on the good side of the judges.

When it comes to the prosecution being the State Attorney General's Office, it must be understood that the Attorney General is the defense counsel for the judges, and they must maintain a good sembyonick relationship. This, I got from the Attorney General's Office personally stated this to me in the elevator. They admit they have a conflict of interest with the judges of California.

In saying what I have said above, it should be known that not all prosecutors are going along with the system. Two L.A. County Prosecutors called me as asked what they could do about judicial immunity in relation to criminal matters. What they told me that they were seeking to prosecute two L.A. County Superior Court judges, and these judges were successfully asserting that they were covered by judicial immunity, and the judge hearing the prosecution's case, agreed with these judge's defense to the prosecution. I told them that there is no principle in law or court cases in which judges had immunity from criminal prosecution, but that was what these prosecutors were facing.

Now in responding to your statement, "But the Courts have made a good point.  The grand jury exists not to prosecute but to investigate and report." 
The Grand Jury is the People. We, the People, allow the prosecution access to bring their complaint to us for us to consider if their complaint meets the standards of Probable Cause. We make the final unappealable decision of this question. Obviously, while we allow the prosecution access to us, we do not preclude ourselves from ourselves. The Grand Jury is not a government body, but the People's body. This is why we are not a Fourth Branch of Government in the Constitution, but the root and trunk of the tree upon which the three Branches of Government spring. We do not answer to the Government, but the Government answers to us.

As has been said, The Grand Jury is both a Shield of the People, and a Sword of the People. The Government comes to the Grand Jury seeking an indictment of the People. They swing at the People with their Sword, and the Grand Jury [the People] has the liberty of throwing up their Shield.

Likewise, when the People come to the Grand Jury with a complaint about Government, the Grand Jury, through its autonomous People, may lift their People Sword and pursue the Government evil-doers. Else, how would the People have the power to go after Government corruption?

Now you state that the Constitution need to "redefining the nature of grand jury investigations." To this I agree, as the Constitution actually has next to nothing  expressing the powers and duties of the Grand Jury. This is precisely why I carefully worded the J.A.I.L. Special Grand Jury to resolve this issue. I even provided for Special Prosecutors that work for the Grand Jury in prosecuting judges.

We must remember above all, that all power must originate from the People, and return to the People. In effect, within the construction of Government, the People must be the Alpha and the Omega, the First and the Last! This is precisely why Government greatly fears JAIL4Judges because it closes the loopholes within our Constitution, especially regarding judges and prosecutors.

Ron Branson