[Victims of Court Corruption] Most Parking Meters Are Illegal

Mike Lerman, I have a great idea. Just for the sake of publicity, perhaps shop owners and businesses could bring a class action suit together demanding return of all the millions collected on their properties for the last year from those parking meters. Think of the hullabaloo this would cause!

They should challenge the city to produce their evidence that they are the taxpayer and legal owner of title to the plot on which those meters stand, and then compel them to reveal just how much money they have gathered from these owner's property, and for the return of such sum for selling parking places on their property. I think we have clearly a Forth Amendment case here.

Ron

-------- Original Message --------

FFT Mike wrote if municipalities would get out of the praetor economic extraction business  and go into the how can I serve you with honest beneficial public service business they would have an abundance of revenue and their would be no need for income or property taxes to make their budgets i can think of hundreds of great ways they can make this transition --- On Thu, 12/6/12, Ron Branson <VictoryUSA@JAIL4Judges.org> wrote: From: Ron Branson <VictoryUSA@JAIL4Judges.org> Subject: Most Parking Meters Are Illegal To: VictoryUSA@JAIL4Judges.org Date: Thursday, December 6, 2012, 10:39 PM Most Parking Meters are illegal and also bad for business and the economy. How are parking meters illegal. Property owners are on record as owning their property from the back of the plot all the way forward to the middle of the street, and that is what their property tax pays for. Every Surveyor will verify this, as well as the County Assessor. Along with this title of ownership is a designated easement. Generally, there are two easements upon each plot. Along the back of the property is an utility easement wherein telephone poles, electricity and telephone lines flow. Utilities may enter upon the property for the purpose of maintenance and care, however, they may not set up some other revenue venture business upon the owners property. For instance, they may not open a retail business of selling filtered water. On the front of most every lot is an easement for public passage of automobiles, and sidewalks for pedestrian traffic. On this easement, the public may freely pass, but may not stop and set up a lemonade stand and market lemonade to the passer's by. Essentially, what the city is doing by setting up parking meters along the streets is trespassing on the private property of another who has paid the property taxes for this footage, and setting up a business for the purpose of making money. We would think it outrageous if the property owners set up their own parking meters along their property line, and charged everyone for parking on their property. If we think this outrageous, then how about someone else who does not even own the property setting up meters and charging the public to park in front of someone else's property. Dare I challenge the city to show proof of ownership on the title to the property upon which they place their parking meters? I do not believe they would be be able to produce proof that they are the annual property taxpayer upon the tax rolls for that property. My second point is, parking meters are bad for business and the economy. In the City of San Jose, California, the business owners compelled the city to remove parking meters as it was inhibiting their business. What they found was that when the patrons could do business elsewhere without the meters, they chose to take their business elsewhere. This created an unfair advantage of the businesses without parking meters over those with parking meters. This argument is logical to understand, as even I find myself abandoning business when I can go elsewhere and get the same goods and services without feeding a parking meter. And which one of us loves feeding parking meters? The City of Downtown Los Angeles is a prime example of what I am saying. It is unable to be self-supporting, and requires the revenue from places such at the San Fernando Valley, which pays two dollars in tax to downtown, and only receive one dollar of benefits in return. -- Ron Branson VictoryUSA@JAIL4Judges.org www.JAIL4Judges.org www.SD-JAIL4Judges.org

--
Ron Branson VictoryUSA@JAIL4Judges.org www.JAIL4Judges.org www.SD-JAIL4Judges.org

[Victims of Court Corruption] I Was Screwed By My Judge

I Was Screwed By My Judge

It has been said, if you want justice, go to a brothel, you will receive what you pay for. However, if you want to get screwed, go to court.

With that said, we have all heard in the national news about the shirtless 3rd Circuit Judge who sent photos of himself to various female court employees. Now, according to the below 12/7/2012 CBS News Report, we are told that this judge exposed more than his chest to at least one female witness in a case involving child support who has come forth with hundreds of text messages from the judge stating she is now pregnant with his child. One may wonder if this judge takes child support issues very personal. Perhaps he can argue that he is a judge, and as such, is covered by judicial immunity and entitled to screw people.

Ron Branson
VictoryUSA@jail4judges.org

*   *   *

http://detroit.cbslocal.com/2012/12/07/shirtless-judge-mccree-allegedly-impregnates-witness-lets-her-decide-exs-sentence/

‘Shirtless Judge’ McCree Allegedly Impregnates Witness, Lets Her Decide Ex’s Sentence

December 7, 2012 4:06 PM

This is a cropped version of the photo Wayne County Judge Wade McCree allegedly sent to women, including staffers. (Photo courtesy: MyFOX Detroit)

Reporting Charlie Langton

DETROIT (Talk Radio 1270) Is there shame in his game now? The 3rd Circuit Court Judge who made headlines by sending a female employee a shirtless picture of himself was ensnared again when a woman came forward with hundreds of text messages she says proves he initiated an affair with her when she came into his courtroom seeking child support.

Genine Le’Shay Mott is now pregnant, she says with the judge’s child. Text messages allegedly show him urging her to have an abortion, writing, “you’ll get whatever you want 4 it.”

Most startling of all from a criminal perspective — her text messages show the judge let her weigh in on the sentence her ex faced in court.

“He’s texting her messages from the bench, negotiating punishment for the (baby’s) father,” said journalist Charlie LeDuff, who broke the story late Thursday. He appeared on the Charlie Langton Talk Radio 1270 show Friday morning to spill the tale again.

One text shows McCree writing: “OK, The math will be based on his failures since being placed on probation, but if U’r right, the threat of jail will loosen his purse strings!”

His erstwhile girlfriend responded: “OK, So let’s go with what you proposed .. Go 2 jail (150 days), release upon payment of $1,500. Or get a tether and bring back w/n 30 days $2,500 or serve 9 months! Bonus: Pay w/n 30 days, remove tether. Now back 2 us … What are we doin after court Thursday?"

The ex did go to jail, while Mott and the judge — what they did, she said — was have sex in spots all over his judicial chambers.

“She’s well-spoken, credible, and half his age,” LeDuff said.

This news comes after the judge accepted a censure from the Michigan Supreme Court for allegedly taking naked photos of himself from the waist up and sending them to a court bailiff. When confronted by LeDuff, McCree said “ain’t no shame in my game.” He later apologized, said the photo was a “serious mistake,” and went back to work with a censure in his background. Langton, who is also WWJ’s legal analyst, said the judge could lose his job over the latest allegations.

“I believe it’s obstruction of justice,” Langton said about the judge allegedly letting the complaining witness weigh in on her boyfriend’s sentencing. “You can’t get advice from a witness in a case who has a vested interest in her ex going to jail.”

Mott said McCree got cold feet about their relationship when his wife found out about the pregnancy. He filed a complaint with the Wayne County prosecutor last week, saying she was stalking him. The prosecutor found his complaints baseless and refused to bring charges.

LeDuff tried to confront the judge at his home about the allegations. ”Sorry cannot do it,” McCree said when LeDuff showed up at his house. “All matters are with the prosecutor’s office.”

What happens next? “You don’t get three strikes when you’re a judge,” Langton said, adding McCree could face repercussions from the Michigan Judicial Tenure Commission for misconduct — and face a criminal complaint for obstruction of justice.

“When I found out about the texts and the sentencing, that’s a breach,” LeDuff said. “How crazy, this is a guy not thinking clearly.”