Monday, May 07, 2012

[Victims of Court Corruption] Tyranny Is A Concept, Not A Group Of Men - Harsha Sankar


Tyranny Is A Concept,
Not A Group Of Men
Harsha Sankar

May 2012

Dear Citizen:
 
In America, ridiculously high verdicts in the millions are constantly rendered. This probably was produced, as usually is the case, by a hand-picked, dumbed down, favor-owing, and manipulated jury.

The BAR's dominance of the legal system has "monetized" justice. There are no proof of damages and yet these activities occur.

Jackpot Justice for a few, means Crackpot Injustice for all, as the Hackpots, who have engineered this sham system, have also thoroughly plunged America into chaos, paralysis, and eventual ruin.

BAR judges will obviously cater to these gross obscenities and irregularities by their arbitrary and filtered instructions. Americans had been warned that if BAR Attorney opportunists land on the bench, this unrestrained behavior will continue unabated.

Runaway verdicts are nothing any American can take pride. Rather, it should always be considered a social evil and the legal profession's heavy-handedness is indeed a source of national
shame. All should view this as sedition as only havoc and uncertainty are produced. These degenerate legal actions are not sound application of law, but they are rather the acts of an organized criminal syndicate.

The increasingly meritless and standardless legal system, completely manned by the increasingly meritless and standardless legal profession, insists that there is a "Method To The Madness". There is none to all of this. All this will reduce incentives for people to work and also to become free market entrepreneurs.

To loosely borrow from Marcus Cicero, ancient Roman statesman, no nation can survive true treason. Enemies at the gates are less formidable, because they are openly known. Treason is always within those gates. The "Traitor" appears not as a traitor but as everyone else. While he may appeal to the baseness in the hearts of man, he in turn rots the soul of the nation. The "Traitor" undermines the pillars of freedom and infects not just the body politic, but all society as well.

Who is the "Traitor"? It is not the politicians, nor bureaucrats. It is not the judges and prosecutors. It is not the attorneys and their lobbyists. It is not even the BAR Associations that control the preceding. The "Traitor" are the American people themselves.

Only a small percentage can qualify as purely victim or as purely abuser. The vast majority of Americans have to be categorized as both. It must be noted that tyranny is never an individual or group
of people. Tyranny is an idea, a concept that people either embrace or accept as normal. For tyranny to be vanquished, it must first be unmasked and then exposed as such. People accept BAR attorney/lobbyist rule because they have been conditioned to do just that.

For Americans to unshackle their chains, they must first free their minds. The perverse "idiotology" and deranged philosophy of the BAR are the results of defects of the American psyche. Not only do the people just not tolerate this, they also elect them to office. Americans must buck certain current trends.

Very Truly Yours,

Harsha Sankar
908 Valley Ridge Road
Covington,Virginia


Jeremiah 5:31, "The prophets prophesy falsely, and the priests bear rule by their means; and my people love to have it so: and what will ye do in the end thereof?"


[Victims of Court Corruption] Mr. Branson, may we call upon you for a simple solution?


Mr. Branson, may we call upon you
for a simple solution by which we can restore our republic?  I suspect most Americans would be eternally grateful!



Arnie Rosner wrote:
My Dear Mr. Branson,

Thank you for sharing this very enlightening revelation with regard to the intentional violation of California State law by those whose job is to enforce the law.  It appears in the case of Mr. Servin, there may be a possibility that justice will be served, After all.

But then what explains the lack of justice being served on much more serious matters?  Matters like national security? Matters like the violations of the Constitution of the United States of America? Matters like the violations being committed by those very same people entrusted with the responsibility of representing the people of the United States, in making our laws?

Mr. Branson, it is obvious your knowledge of the law is quite evident.  In fact, your grasp of the basic legal principles would seem to far surpass, any demonstration of any more sophisticated legal principles displayed by any and all members of any levels of the judiciary...nation-wide.  

Perhaps we, as just common, ordinary plain vanilla variety Americans can call on you to propose just how we, the American people can deal with the greatest Constitutional crisis deliberately engineered by our elected officials in Congress, who seem determined to compound their acts of treason with untold measures of treachery.  

So Mr. Branson, may we call upon you for a simple solution by which we can restore our republic?  I suspect most Americans would be eternally grateful!

Arnie
 
Available 24/7 - Defending freedom has become a full-time job!
arnie@arnierosner.com


Ron Writes:

Arnie, you must realize that as the days become more evil, everything gets turned Topsy-tervy. That which is important is totally disregarded, and that which is of little relevance is pursued to the fullest extent of the law. Take for instance, the Federal Reserve scam swallows up this entire county, and is obviously unconstitutional, yet its atrocities are ignored by everyone in power. A Mexican hits up a liquor store getting away with only a small pocket money, and the police, in their zeal to come up with a perpetrator, blows away a black man nearby in his garage as he was getting out of his car because "He looked suspicious. Besides, if he didn't do it, he is probably guilty of something." This is a real live example reported in the Los Angeles Times that actually happened. It is too bad this man was not a lawyer in a three-piece suit in Washington, District of Criminals, ripping off millions of dollars from the sucker taxpayers.

Anyway, I wrote, and presented to Congress the below Bill for their consideration at the turn of this century. Were any of them excited? Absolutely not. Dare anyone propose enacting legislation restoring the Constitution and power to the People.

Below is that very propose legislation which is filed in their Library of Congress. Perhaps you can motivate the People to be eternally grateful, telling them that we must absolutely get this legislation passed so that we can get back to the constitutional republic envisioned by our fore Fathers. If the People receive not this Judicial Accountability Bill, neither will they be convinced though another attempted Bill for Judicial Accountability be proposed.

Ron Branson
VictoryUSA@jail4judges.org


Judicial Accountability & Integrity Legislation

(Judicial Bill Written for Congress)
Filed in the Library of Congress
 
            (a) Preamble. The House of Representatives and Senate Assembled find: that an inordinate and ever-growing number of complaints for willful misconduct have been lodged with Congress involving federal judges across this nation; that the current Title 28 U.S.C. §372(c) (Judicial Misconduct and Disability Act) is in many cases inadequate due to conflicts of interest of judges judging themselves; that judicial integrity is of major importance which affects all areas of our American society. Be it therefore resolved that the House of Representatives and Senate Assembled hereby enact the following legislation which shall be known as the "Judicial Accountability and Integrity Legislation."

            (b) Definitions. For purposes of this statute:

1. The term "blocking" shall mean any act that impedes the lawful conclusion of a case, to include unreasonable delay and willful rendering of a void judgment or order.

2. The term "federal judge" or "judge" shall mean any federal justice, judge, magistrate, commissioner, or any person shielded by judicial immunity.

                        3. The term "Juror" shall mean a Special Federal Grand Juror.
4. The term "strike" shall mean an adverse immunity decision based upon bad behavior as set forth by paragraph (c), or a criminal conviction as set forth in paragraph (r).
Where appropriate, the singular shall include the plural, and the plural the singular.

            (c) Immunity. Notwithstanding common law or any other provision to the contrary, no immunities shall be extended to any federal judge except as is specifically set forth in this statute. Preserving the purpose of protecting judges from frivolous and harassing actions, no immunity shielding a federal judge shall be construed to extend to any deliberate violation of law, fraud or conspiracy, intentional violation of due process of law, deliberate disregard of material facts, judicial acts without jurisdiction, blocking of a lawful conclusion of a case, or any deliberate violation of the Constitution of these United States, all violations of which shall constitute bad behavior.

            (d) Special Federal Grand Jury. There is hereby created within the District of Columbia a twenty-five member Special Federal Grand Jury with full federal geographical jurisdiction having power to judge on both law and fact. Their responsibility shall be limited to determining, on an objective standard, whether a civil suit against a federal judge would be frivolous and harassing, or fall within the exclusions of immunity as set forth herein, and whether there is probable cause of criminal conduct by the federal judge complained of.

            (e) Professional Counsel. The Special Federal Grand Jury shall have exclusive power to retain non-governmental advisors, special prosecutors, and investigators, as needed, who shall serve no longer than two years, after which term said officers shall be ineligible. However, with permission of the Special Federal Grand Jury, a special prosecutor may prosecute their current cases through all appeals and any applicable complaints to the Special Federal Grand Jury.

            (f) Establishment of a Special Federal Grand Jury Seat. A Special Federal Grand Jury seat is hereby created, which seat shall be located in excess of one mile of any federal judicial body.
           
            (g) Filing Fees. Attorneys representing a client filing a civil complaint or answer before the Special Federal Grand Jury, shall at the time of filing pay a fee equal to the filing fee due in a civil appeal to the United States Supreme Court. Individuals filing a civil complaint or answer before the Special Federal Grand Jury in their own behalf as a matter of right, shall, at the time of filing, post a fee of one hundred dollars, or file a declaration, which shall remain confidential, stating they are impoverished and unable to pay and/or object to such fee.

           (h)  Annual Funding. Should this statute lack sufficient funding through its filing fees under paragraph (g), and fines imposed under paragraph (q), which amount shall be deposited regularly into the exclusive trust account crated by this statute in paragraph (j) for its operational expenses, Congress may impose appropriate surcharges upon the civil court filing fees of corporate litigants as necessary to make this statute self-supporting, or they may appropriate any and all the necessary funds for the full implementation of this statute by legislation.

            (i) Compensation of Jurors. Each Juror shall receive a salary commensurate to fifty percent of a federal district judge prorated according to the number of days actually served.

            (j) Annual Budget. The Special Federal Grand Jury shall have an annual operational budget commensurate to twenty times the combined salaries of the twenty-five Jurors serving full time, which sum shall be initially deposited by Congress into an exclusive trust account to be annually administered by the Controller. Should the trust balance, within any budget year, drop to less than an amount equivalent to the annual gross salaries of fifty federal district judges, the Controller shall so notify Congress which shall replenish the account, prorated based on the actual average expenditures during the budget year. Should the trust balance in any subsequent year exceed the annual operational budget at the beginning of a new budget year, the Controller shall return such excess to the United States Treasury.

            (k) Jurisdiction.   The Special Federal Grand Jury shall have exclusive power to establish rules assuring their attendance, to provide internal discipline, and to remove any of its members on grounds of misconduct. The Special Federal Grand Jury shall immediately assign a docket number to each complaint brought before it. Except as provided in paragraph (r), no complaint of judicial misconduct shall be considered by the Special Federal Grand Jury unless the complainant shall have first attempted to exhaust all judicial remedies available in the federal courts within the immediately preceding six-month period. Such six-month period, however, shall not commence in complaints of prior fraud or blocking of a lawful conclusion until after the date the Special Federal Grand Jury becomes functional. This provision is intended to apply remedially and retroactively.

            (l) Qualifications of Jurors. A Juror shall have attained to the age of thirty years, and have been nine years a citizen of the United States , and an inhabitant of Washington , D.C. Those not eligible for Special Federal Grand Jury service shall include elected and appointed officials, members of the Bar, judges (active or retired), judicial, prosecutorial and law enforcement personnel, without other exclusion except previous adjudication of mental incapacity, imprisonment, or parole from a conviction of a felonious crime against persons.

            (m) Selection of Jurors. The Jurors shall serve without compulsion and shall be drawn  by public lot by the Secretary of State from names on the voters rolls and any citizen submitting his/her name to the Secretary of State for such drawing.

            (n) Service of Jurors. Excluding the establishment of the initial Special Federal Grand Jury, each Juror shall serve one year. No Juror shall serve more than once. On the first day of each month, two persons shall be rotated off the Special Federal Grand Jury and new Citizens seated, except in January it shall be three. Vacancies shall be filled on the first of the following month in addition to the Jurors regularly rotated, and the Juror chosen to fill a vacancy shall complete only the remainder of the term of the Juror replaced.

            (o) Procedures. The Special Federal Grand Jury shall serve a copy of the filed complaint upon the subject judge and notice to the complainant of such service. The judge shall have thirty days to serve and file an answer. The complainant shall have twenty days to reply to the judge's answer. (Upon timely request, the Special Federal Grand Jury may provide for extensions for good cause.) The Special Federal Grand Jury shall have power to subpoena witnesses, documents, and other tangible evidence, and to examine witnesses under oath. The Special Federal Grand Jury shall determine the causes properly before it with their reasoned findings in writing within one hundred twenty (120) calendar days, serving on all parties their decision on whether immunity shall be barred as a defense to any civil action that may thereafter be pursued against the federal judge. A rehearing may be requested of the Special Federal Grand Jury within twenty days with service upon the opposition. Twenty days shall be allowed to reply thereto. Thereafter, the Special Federal Grand Jury shall render final determination within thirty days. All allegations of the complaint shall be liberally construed in favor of the complainant. The Jurors shall keep in mind, in making their decisions, that they are entrusted by the people of these United States with the duty of restoring a perception of justice and accountability of the federal judiciary, and are not to be swayed by artful presentation by the federal judge. They shall avoid all influence by judicial and government entities. The statute of limitations on any civil suit brought pursuant to this statute against a federal judge shall not commence until the rendering of a final decision by the Special Federal Grand Jury. Special Federal Grand Jury files shall always remain public record following their final determination. A majority of thirteen shall determine any matter.

            (p) Removal. Whenever any federal judge shall have received more than three strikes, the federal judge shall automatically be brought up on charges before Congress for Articles of Impeachment by the Special Federal Grand Jury through its special prosecutor for bad behavior and willful misconduct. Congress thereafter shall commence to a vote on such Articles of Impeachment. Upon a conviction, the federal judge shall be permanently removed from office. He may also be held liable under any other appropriate criminal or civil proceeding.

            (q) Indictment. Should the Special Federal Grand Jury also find probable cause of criminal conduct on the part of any federal judge against whom a complaint is docketed, it shall have the power to indict such federal judge except where double jeopardy attaches. The Special Federal Grand Jury shall, without voir dire beyond personal relationship, cause to be impaneled special trial jurors, plus alternates, which trial jurors shall be instructed that they have power to judge both law and fact. The Special Federal Grand Jury shall also select a non-governmental special prosecutor and a federal judge with no more than four years on the bench from a state other than that of the defendant judge, (or outside of the District of Columbia, if the case so be). The trial jury shall be selected from the same pool of jury candidates as any regular federal jury. The special prosecutor shall thereafter prosecute the cause to a conclusion, having all the powers of any other prosecutor within these United States . Upon conviction, the special trial jury shall have exclusive power of sentencing (limited to incarceration, fines and/or community service), which shall be derived by an average of the sentences of the trial jurors.

            (r) Criminal Procedures. In addition to any other provisions of this statute, a complaint for criminal conduct of a federal judge may be brought directly to the Special Federal Grand Jury upon all the following prerequisites: (1) an affidavit of criminal conduct has been lodged with the appropriate prosecutorial entity within ninety (90) days of the commission of the alleged conduct; (2) the prosecutor declines to prosecute, or one hundred twenty (120) days has passed following the lodging of such affidavit and prosecution has not commenced; (3) an indictment, if sought, has not been specifically declined on the merits by a Grand Jury; and (4) the criminal statute of limitations has not run. Any criminal conviction (including a plea bargain) under any judicial process shall constitute a strike.

            (s) Public Indemnification. No federal judge complained of, or sued civilly by a complainant pursuant to this statute shall be defended at public expense or by any elected or appointed public counsel, nor shall any federal judge be reimbursed from public funds for any losses sustained under this statute.

            (t) Redress. The provisions of this statute are in addition to other redress that may exist and are not mutually exclusive.

            (u) Preeminence.  Preeminence shall be given to this statute in any case of conflicts with any other federal statutes, case law, or common law to the contrary. The foreperson of the Special Federal Grand Jury shall read, or cause to be read, this statute to the respective Jurors semi-annually during the first week of business in January and July.



[Victims of Court Corruption] Knoxville, Tenn. Criminal Appeals Judge Arrested on D.U.I. Can Still Sit on Bench

No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2012.0.1913 / Virus Database: 2425/4981 - Release Date: 05/06/12



-------- Original Message --------
Subject: FW: Judge Smith Arrested on DUI charges, Janice Johnson comments to Channel 4 News
Date: Sat, 5 May 2012 22:00:05 -0500
From: Janice Johnson <jj4cc@comcast.net>
To: 'Ron Branson' <VictoryUSA@jail4judges.org>


Ron,

 

You think that the police officer issue was bad, here’s what we have to deal with in Tennessee:  A criminal court of appeals judge ... with DUI charges; a judge who made his own “snuff tape” ... and remains on the bench; a judge ... who gets drugs and sex from individuals in his courtroom (and simply retires with full benefits at taxpayer expense);
… these are just a few of the cases.

 

Janice Johnson

 

http://www.wsmv.com/story/17674989/appeals-court-judge-arrested

Appeals court judge arrested on DUI charges

Posted: Apr 24, 2012 11:55 AM CDT<em class="wnDate">Tuesday, April 24, 2012 12:55 PM EST</em>Updated: Apr 24, 2012 7:09 PM CDT<em class="wnDate">Tuesday, April 24, 2012 8:09 PM EST</em>

Reported by Dennis Ferrier - email





Judge Jerry L. Smith



KNOXVILLE, TN (WSMV) -


A Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals judge, who works in Nashville, was arrested Monday night on driving under the influence charges in Knoxville.

Officers said they spotted Judge Jerry L. Smith driving a car that had its trunk open with luggage about to fall out.

When officers pulled Smith over, they said he smelled of alcohol, had slurred speech and couldn't perform a sobriety test.

Smith was appointed in 1995 to the Court of Criminal Appeals. Before that, he worked as the deputy state attorney general.

As a criminal court of appeals judge, Smith could very likely hear appeal cases involving DUIs, and for that reason alone some judicial reformists say Judge Smith should step down.

"The prosecutor is very conflicted in this case. He has got to prosecute other DUI cases that could be appealed to his very courtroom," said Janice Johnson, a judicial reformist and lobbyist.

But the Tennessee Supreme Court told Channel 4 that even if convicted, Judge Smith would still be allowed to hear cases.

Any judge convicted of any misdemeanor in Tennessee is not barred in any way.

Janice Johnson says Judge Smith should be removed by the one entity in Tennessee that has the power to do so.

"A DUI is minor, however, judges should be held to a higher standard. The question is who holds them to a higher standard. And the answer is our legislature is supposed to hold them to a higher standard," Johnson said. "The problem is our legislature does not have the political will to do so."

It should be noted that the Tennessee legislature hasn't removed a judge in 18 years, and it is an action that almost never happens.

Copyright 2012 WSMV (Meredith Corporation). All rights reserved.

 
 Janice Johnson