Saturday, June 29, 2013

[Victims of Court Corruption] California's Ding-Bat Women in Power!

begin:vcard
fn:Ron Branson
n:Branson;Ron
org:www.jail4judges.org
adr;dom:;;P.O. Box 207;North Hollywood,;CA.;91603
email;internet:VictoryUSA@JAIL4Judges.org
title:National J.A.I.L. Commander-In-Chief
tel;work:http://vimeo.com/63749370
note;quoted-printable:Ron Branson=0D=0A=
National J.A.I.L. Commander-In-Chief=0D=0A=
VictoryUSA@JAIL4Judges.org=0D=0A=
=0D=0A=
www.JAIL4Judges.Org=0D=0A=
www.sd-jail4judges.org=0D=0A=
http://vimeo.com/63749370
url:http://www.jail4judges.org
version:2.1
end:vcard



California's Ding-Bat Women in Power!


"All vets are mentally ill and government should prevent them from owning firearms"  - Senator Dianne Feinstein

Yep, she really said this on Thursday 6/27/13 in a meeting in front of the Senate Judiciary Committee. . and the quote below from the LA Times is priceless. Sometimes even the L.A. Times gets it right.

Kurt Nimmo: "Senator Feinstein insults all U.S. Veterans as she flays about in a vain attempt to save her bill."

Quote of the Day from the Los Angeles Times: "Frankly, I don't know what it is about California, but we seem to have a strange urge to elect really obnoxious women to high office. I'm not bragging, you understand, but no other state, including Maine, even comes close. When it comes to sending left-wing dingbats to Washington, we're Number One. There's no getting around the fact that the last time anyone saw the likes of Barbara Boxer, Dianne Feinstein, Maxine Waters, and Nancy Pelosi, they were stirring a cauldron when the curtain went up on 'Macbeth'. The four of them are like jackasses who happen to possess the gift of blab. You don't know if you should condemn them for their stupidity or simply marvel at their ability to form words."

-Columnist Burt Prelutsky, Los Angeles Times



[Victims of Court Corruption] Traditional Marriage v. The Courts

begin:vcard
fn:Ron Branson
n:Branson;Ron
org:www.jail4judges.org
adr;dom:;;P.O. Box 207;North Hollywood,;CA.;91603
email;internet:VictoryUSA@JAIL4Judges.org
title:National J.A.I.L. Commander-In-Chief
tel;work:http://vimeo.com/63749370
note;quoted-printable:Ron Branson=0D=0A=
National J.A.I.L. Commander-In-Chief=0D=0A=
VictoryUSA@JAIL4Judges.org=0D=0A=
=0D=0A=
www.JAIL4Judges.Org=0D=0A=
www.sd-jail4judges.org=0D=0A=
http://vimeo.com/63749370
url:http://www.jail4judges.org
version:2.1
end:vcard



Tradition Marriage v. The Courts

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/jun/26/traditional-marriage-supporters-courts-doma-ruling/





Comment posted to Washington Times by Ron Branson:

In the early stages of the fight to establish the definition of marriage in California, I advised the proponents of what has now become known as "Prop 8" that they were approaching this issue from the wrong perspective. My point was that it will not be the People to decide this issue, but the Courts. People properly seek to pass laws through Congress, their State Legislators, or through State Initiatives, however, the the liberal element simply trump the People by working through the courts.

The battle is not over gay marriage, but rather a battle over the People v. The Courts. The People passed passed Prop 22 through a lawful statutory initiative, but It was simply declared unconstitutional by the Courts. The People, then determined to carry on the fight, passed a constitutional amendment via Prop. 8. Again, the will of the People was simply overturned by the Courts.

It is obvious that the People, unwilling to rest with the Court's decision, are going to try to carry on the fight for their belief that marriage is a union between of one man and one woman, a position Spiritually sound. But what the People have not realized is what I have been telling then even before they attempted Prop. 22, i.e, the basic battle is not over gay marriage, but who holds the aces; the People, or the Courts. It is that point that must be establish first, and then the issue they wish to pursue.

Article II, Sec. I of the California Constitution states clearly, "All political power is inherent in the People. ... [T]hey have the right to alter or reform [government] when the Public good may require." Thus, in a contest between the People v. the Courts, the People are the clear winner.

While the Constitution is clear on this point, the Courts overrule the Constitution. Hence, the question goes beyond the Constitutional superiority of the highest law of the State of California to which all judges swear by an Oath to defend, but enforcement. Enforcement of the Constitution must come from the People, not from the Courts.

Anyone can go on their search engine and search the California Judicial Accountability Initiative measure that must be taken up first by the People, which will afford the People enforcement power over the Courts when it comes to a fight in the Courts over the People v. The Courts.






[Victims of Court Corruption] Michele Bachmann: DOMA, Proposition 8 Rulings Attacked Our Constitution

begin:vcard
fn:Ron Branson
n:Branson;Ron
org:www.jail4judges.org
adr;dom:;;P.O. Box 207;North Hollywood,;CA.;91603
email;internet:VictoryUSA@JAIL4Judges.org
title:National J.A.I.L. Commander-In-Chief
tel;work:http://vimeo.com/63749370
note;quoted-printable:Ron Branson=0D=0A=
National J.A.I.L. Commander-In-Chief=0D=0A=
VictoryUSA@JAIL4Judges.org=0D=0A=
=0D=0A=
www.JAIL4Judges.Org=0D=0A=
www.sd-jail4judges.org=0D=0A=
http://vimeo.com/63749370
url:http://www.jail4judges.org
version:2.1
end:vcard


Michele Bachmann:
DOMA, Propositon 8 Rulings Attacked Our Constitution

The Huffington Post | By Mollie Reilly

Rep. Michele Bachmann, R-Minn., joins House Republicans to speak during a news conference in opposition to the Supreme Court's Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) decision on Wednesday, June 26, 2013. (Photo By Bill Clark/CQ Roll Call)

Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-Minn.) railed against the Supreme Court on Wednesday, blasting the justices for declaring the Defense of Marriage Act unconstitutional and allowing gay marriages to resume in California.

Appearing with other House conservatives during a press conference, Bachmann said the rulings were "offensive on so many levels."

"This decision is one that is profound because the Supreme Court not only attacked our Constitution today, they not only attacked the equal protection rights of every citizen under our Constitution, they attacked something that they have no jurisdiction over whatsoever, the foundational unit of our society, which is marriage," Bachmann said.

She continued, "That is something that God created. That is something that God will define. The Supreme Court, though they may think so, have not risen to the level of God."

Earlier Wednesday, Bachmann issued a written statement condemning the court's decisions:

Marriage was created by the hand of God. No man, not even a Supreme Court, can undo what a holy God has instituted.
For thousands of years of recorded human history, no society has defended the legal standard of marriage as anything other than between man and woman. Only since 2000 have we seen a redefinition of this foundational unit of society in various nations.

Today, the U.S. Supreme Court decided to join the trend, despite the clear will of the people’s representatives through DOMA.

What the Court has done will undermine the best interest of children and the best interests of the United States.

Her condemnation was dismissed by House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.).

"Who cares?" Pelosi asked when questioned about the statement.